Investor Enquiry
Login to PortalSoon
An honest comparison of how UK healthcare providers handle CQC compliance — in-house spreadsheets, paper, generic GRC tools, and purpose-built platforms like Medflow Assure. Updated for the CQC Single Assessment Framework.
CQC compliance is a binding legal requirement for any provider of regulated healthcare in England. What changes is how providers actually do it. Below is an honest comparison of the four approaches we see most often, and what they cost in time, money, and risk.
Medflow Dynamics builds Medflow Assure, which falls into the “purpose-built” column of this comparison. We have included the column on its own merits — every other column reflects what we have actually seen at customers and prospects, and we have tried to be fair to each.
| Capability | Word / SharePoint | Paper-based | Generic GRC tool | Medflow Assure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality Statement mapping built-in | ||||
| Real-time readiness scoring | ||||
| Defensible audit trail | ||||
| Evidence chain visibility | ||||
| Automated policy review cycles | ||||
| Multi-practice / network view | ||||
| AI policy drafting (optional) | ||||
| DCB0129 / DCB0160 alignment | ||||
| NHS DSPT-aligned hosting | ||||
| Setup time |
= supported, = partially / with effort, = not realistically possible
Most practices start here. Policies are Word documents stored on a shared drive or in SharePoint, with cross-referencing to the CQC framework done manually. It works at very small scale and costs nothing in software fees, but it scales badly. Once a practice has 25+ policies and an inspection on the horizon, the manual effort becomes the bottleneck — and the audit trail is whatever you can reconstruct from file modification dates.
A small number of providers still maintain paper-based compliance — folders of printed policies, audit forms in lever-arch files, and signature sheets for staff acknowledgement. This is increasingly rare and is no longer compatible with the way CQC inspectors expect evidence to be presented. We are including it for completeness rather than as a recommendation.
Generic governance, risk, and compliance platforms (ServiceNow GRC, LogicGate, Jira-based setups, and similar) can be configured for CQC compliance. They tend to come with workflow capabilities and decent audit trails. The catch is that they don't ship with the CQC framework, so you spend the first several months building the Single Assessment Framework into them yourself — usually with the help of paid consultants. Total cost of ownership is typically 3–5x what a purpose-built tool costs.
Purpose-built tools like Medflow Assure ship with the Single Assessment Framework, the 34 Quality Statements, evidence categories, and policy templates already in place. New customers are typically productive within 1–2 weeks. Medflow specifically adds AI policy drafting and summarisation as optional add-ons (or bundled in the Professional tier), which can reduce policy maintenance time by 60–80% without compromising on the human-in-the-loop governance that DCB0129 requires.
CQC compliance software is a category of healthcare IT tools that help UK providers maintain inspection readiness against the Care Quality Commission's Single Assessment Framework. The best tools automate policy management, evidence collection, audit cycles, and gap analysis, while keeping a clinician in the loop for every change that influences clinical governance.
Many practices start with Word, SharePoint, and shared drives. It works at very small scale but breaks down once you have 25+ policies, multiple staff updating them, and a CQC inspection on the horizon. The risk isn't the cost of the software — it's the hours lost to inspection prep and the inability to demonstrate a defensible audit trail when an inspector arrives.
Generic governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) tools like ServiceNow GRC, LogicGate, or Jira can technically be configured for CQC. In practice they require months of consultancy to build the framework into them, and they don't ship with the Single Assessment Framework's Quality Statements out of the box. Purpose-built tools save the configuration cost.
Yes. Medflow Assure ships with the Single Assessment Framework built in, including all 34 Quality Statements, the five evidence categories, and templates for the most common policy types. New customers are typically up and running within 1–2 weeks.
Pricing for purpose-built CQC compliance software typically starts around £600–£1,500 per practice per year. Medflow Assure's Essential tier starts at £600/year and gives single-site practices every product feature except AI. AI features are available as paid add-ons or as part of the Professional tier.
Book a 30-minute walkthrough and we will run through the comparison against the tools you already use.
Request a demo